I had a dream

by Shaurya Singh

Summary

Shaurya Singh’s “I Had a Dream” is not just a play; it’s a theatrical rebellion against the mundane. This absurdist masterpiece plunges you into a world where dreams and reality intertwine, where power corrupts, and where the pursuit of freedom takes unexpected turns.

General Deeso, a tyrannical ruler, faces a formidable challenge from Neot, a charismatic rebel leader promising a new dawn. But as the lines between good and evil blur, you’ll question everything you thought you knew about heroes, villains, and the true cost of revolution.

Singh’s masterful storytelling weaves a tale of love, betrayal, and philosophical musings that will leave you breathless. His characters, flawed and complex, grapple with existential questions that mirror our own struggles for meaning and purpose in a chaotic world.

“I Had a Dream” is an emotional rollercoaster, a thought-provoking journey, and a theatrical experience unlike any other. Brace yourself for a mind-bending adventure that will challenge your perceptions, spark your imagination, and leave you craving more.

Watch Now

Experience the powerful performances and thought-provoking dialogues that make ‘I Had a Dream’ an unforgettable journey.

Watch the first episode now on YouTube and prepare to be captivated!

Download the script

“Dive deeper into the narrative with the full script of ‘I Had a Dream.’ Analyze the dialogues, study the characters, and explore the themes at your own pace.”

Immerse yourself in a world on the brink of revolution, where the lines between good and evil blur, and the pursuit of power leads to devastating consequences. Shaurya Singh’s “I Had a Dream” is not your average play. It’s a captivating journey through the complexities of the human spirit, where love, betrayal, and the enduring power of dreams collide.

Witness the clash between General Deeso, a ruthless dictator, and Neot, the enigmatic rebel leader, as their ideologies ignite a gripping drama. Experience the emotional rollercoaster of passionate encounters, heart-wrenching betrayals, and philosophical musings that will leave you questioning everything.

Singh’s masterful storytelling weaves a non-linear narrative, jumping through time and space, mirroring the chaotic nature of the world he depicts. His rich and evocative language, blending poetry, philosophy, and political satire, creates a theatrical experience that is both intellectually stimulating and emotionally resonant.

“I Had a Dream” is more than just a play; it’s a mirror reflecting the complexities of human nature and the timeless struggle for freedom and meaning. Don’t miss this opportunity to witness a truly unique theatrical masterpiece that will challenge your perceptions and leave you wanting more.

Themes

Existentialism and Absurdity

At its core, “I Had a Dream” is a meditation on existentialism. The characters grapple with the futility of their actions, the absurdity of their circumstances, and the overarching question of what it means to be alive in a world seemingly devoid of inherent meaning. This existential angst is palpable in General Deeso’s desperate clinging to power, Neot’s disillusionment with his own revolution, and Bernat’s philosophical musings.

The play also delves into the cyclical nature of power and oppression. The characters are trapped in a seemingly endless loop of revolt and tyranny, with each new leader ultimately becoming a mirror image of the one they overthrew. This motif highlights the futility of political revolution and the inherent corruption that seems to accompany power.

Philosophy

“I Had a Dream” is steeped in existentialist philosophy, drawing heavily from the works of Sartre, Camus, and Nietzsche. The play’s existential dread and absurdity are evident in its portrayal of a world devoid of inherent meaning, where characters struggle to assert their significance. Neot’s revolutionary zeal is a Sisyphean endeavor, an exercise in futility against the immutable absurdity of existence.

The play’s conclusion, where Neot’s grand dreams are revealed to be mere fantasies, echoes Camus’s notion of the absurd hero. Neot, much like Camus’s Sisyphus, is condemned to an endless struggle, yet it is in this struggle that he finds his identity. The acceptance of absurdity, rather than the conquest of it, becomes the ultimate act of rebellion.

Reality Vs. Illusion

At the heart of “I Had a Dream” lies the perpetual conflict between reality and illusion. The play’s protagonist, Neot, epitomizes this struggle. As a revolutionary leader, Neot’s grandiose visions of societal upheaval often blur the lines between what is real and what is imagined. This theme is encapsulated in the recurring motif of dreams versus waking life, where characters navigate a landscape that is both familiar and fantastical. The dream sequences, replete with surreal imagery, challenge the audience to discern the boundaries of Neot’s reality, reflecting the broader existential question: What is the true nature of our existence?

Control vs. Surrender

A profound philosophical undercurrent in the play is the dichotomy between control and surrender. Neot’s journey is marked by his oscillation between attempting to control his destiny and ultimately surrendering to the flow of events. This theme is poignantly illustrated in his interactions with other characters, each symbolizing different facets of human experience and control. Bernat, the intellectual, represents the futile attempt to rationalize the absurd, while Uma, with her superficial desires, embodies the surrender to mundane existence. This thematic exploration questions the human impulse to dominate life versus the wisdom of yielding to its inherent unpredictability.

Memory and Identity

Memory, as a construct of identity, is another central theme. The fragmented narrative structure of “I Had a Dream” mirrors the protagonist’s disjointed recollections, highlighting the impermanence and subjectivity of memory. General Deeso’s character serves as a tragicomic representation of the absurdity of authority, his own memories distorted by power and delusion. This exploration of memory underscores the existential crisis of identity, suggesting that who we are is as fluid and mutable as our recollections.